------=_Part_23204_17319508.1200470437753
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
sorry for the latye replay,
Then I will have to much templates, because i will need for every
kombination of args a new template.
For example by check_http I will need a template vor every website/service =
i
want to check or for every disk with diffrend warning and Critival
threshosld.
Thats not so practicable.
Mark
On Dec 14, 2007 4:51 PM, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> Mark Eisenblaetter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > for my distributed monitoring it would be great if i where possible t=
o
> > say:
> > Use the Template and not the option set in the definition.
> >
> > My problem is that when i have an active check on an distributed server
> it
> > is passiv on the master.
> > I control this beavior with the template system (diffrend templates on
> > maser/slave)
> >
> > But i if use check_freshness on the master it will use the check_comman=
d
> and
> > f.e pings the Host which could get me the wrong results
> > if for example the ip address on both location pingable but differend
> server
> > i will get the wron result.
> >
> > so it would be great if i can say in the template use the check_command
> > (check_dummy) defined in the template and not that defined in the Host.
> >
>
> That's what not setting anything in the object itself is for. If you don'=
t
> have a check_command in the host object, it will use the one from the
> template.
>
> --
> Andreas Ericsson [email protected]
> OP5 AB www.op5.se
> Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services
> for just about anything Open Source.
>
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239 ... /marketpl=
ace
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis ... gios-devel
>
--=20
Mark Eisenbl=E4tter
Geissendoerfer & Leschinsky GmbH
www.gl-sytemhaus.de
------=_Part_23204_17319508.1200470437753
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,sorry for the latye replay,Then I will have to much template=
s, because i will need for every kombination of args a new template.For example by check_http I will need a template vor every website/service=
i want to check or for every disk with diffrend warning and Critival thres=
hosld.
Thats not so practicable. Mark On Dec 14, 2007 4:51 PM, Andreas Ericsson <[email protected]> wrote:
Mark Eisenblaetter wrote:> Hi,>>=
> for my distributed monitoring it would be great if i where &=
nbsp;possible to> say:> Use the Template and not the option s=
et in the definition.
>> My problem is that when i have an active check on an distr=
ibuted server it> is passiv on the master.> I control this be=
avior with the template system (diffrend templates on> maser/slave)
>> But i if use check_freshness on the master it will use the=
check_command and> f.e pings the Host which could get me the wrong =
results> if for example the ip address on both location pingable but=
differend server
> i will get the wron result.>> so it would be great i=
f i can say in the template use the check_command> (check_dummy) def=
ined in the template and not that defined in the Host.>
That's what
...[email truncated]...
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]