------=_Part_16092_3040976.1201184716943
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Jan 16, 2008 10:38 AM, Mark Eisenblaetter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Jan 16, 2008 10:07 AM, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>
> > Please don't top-post. It makes it hard to follow the discussion,
> > especially when you're top-posting to an answer that wasn't top-
> > posted. Anyways...
> >
> > Mark Eisenblaetter wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > sorry for the latye replay,
> > >
> > > Then I will have to much templates, because i will need for every
> > > kombination of args a new template.
> > >
> > > For example by check_http I will need a template vor every
> > website/service i
> > > want to check or for every disk with diffrend warning and Critival
> > > threshosld.
> > >
> > > Thats not so practicable.
> > >
> >
> > Originally you wrote:
> > >>> so it would be great if i can say in the template use the
> > check_command
> > >>> (check_dummy) defined in the template and not that defined in the
> > Host.
> > >>>
> >
> > To which I replied:
> > >> That's what not setting anything in the object itself is for. If you
> > don't
> > >> have a check_command in the host object, it will use the one from the
> > >> template.
> > >>
> >
> > In other words, if you want a particular object to inherit the value
> > from
> > the template, simply don't set that value in the object. There was no
> > other question-like statement in your original mail.
> >
>
> Ok, then my first mail was not so clear I hoped.
>
> I was thinking of that as a new feature, to minimize the templatework.
>
>
Ok it seems that i am the only one that would like this feature.
Or do i miss one way to handle that situation without having a template for
nearly every check?
Mark
------=_Part_16092_3040976.1201184716943
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Jan 16, 2008 10:38 AM, Mark Eisenblaetter <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,On Jan 16, 2008 10:07 AM, Andreas Ericsson <[email protected]> wrote:
Please don't top-post. It makes it hard to follow the discussion,especially when you're top-posting to an answer that wasn't top-posted. Anyways...Mark Eisenblaetter wrote:
> Hi,> sorry for the latye replay,>> Then I will have to much templates, because i will need for every> kombination of args a new template.>> For example by check_http I will need a template vor every website/service i
> want to check or for every disk with diffrend warning and Critival> threshosld.>> Thats not so practicable.>Originally you wrote:>>> so it would be great if i can say in the template use the check_command
>>> (check_dummy) defined in the template and not that defined in the Host.>>>To which I replied:>> That's what not setting anything in the object itself is for. If you don't
>> have a check_command in the host object, it will use the one from the>> template.>>In other words, if you want a particular object to inherit the value fromthe template, simply don't set that value in the object. There was no
other question-like statement in your original mail.Ok, then my first mail was not so clear I hoped.
I was thinking of that as a new feature, to minimize the templatework.
</div
...[email truncated]...
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]