Matthew Kent wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 01:38, Ethan Galstad wrote:
>
>>Unless a major problem arises, I plan on releasing 2.0b1 tomorrow
>>evening or Wednesday. If you've got some time, grab the latest CVS
>>snapshot and give it a whirl to see if there are any showstoppers.
>>
>>Some submitted patches have not been applied to the beta release
>>code. I felt that most of these were enhancements to Nagios rather
>>than bug fixes. Development on 2.0 has gone on long enough, so I'm
>>cutting off any new enhancements for the time being. Here's the
>>status of some of the unapplied patches...
>
>
> Thanks for the update on everything Ethan.
>
> I've been using the latest CVS for a while now and haven't come across
> any issues at all. We've also been using it in production at work for
> the past ~6 months with no problems.
>
We've been having problems with random crashes (with latest CVS) on 3
installations, but it appears to be a gcc or glibc bug. So far it hasn't
happened with the default CFLAGS, while it does occur (at random, so
unreproducable in production) with
-pipe -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -O2 -momit-leaf-frame-pointer
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=3
It's been known to happen on both SMP and single cpu systems, so it's
not likely a kernel bug.
--
Andreas Ericsson [email protected]
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Lead Developer
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]